Call Us: (248) 986-2290


The Differences Between an Additional Assessment and a Special Assessment in a Michigan Condominium Association

As many new condominium co-owners are aware, the general operations of a condominium association are funded through annual assessments. MCL 559.169 sets forth the requirements for imposing assessments in a Michigan Condominium as follows:

559.169 Assessment of common expenses; contribution of co-owner.
Sec. 69. (1) Except to the extent that the condominium documents provide otherwise, common expenses associated with the maintenance, repair, renovation, restoration, or replacement of a limited common element shall be specially assessed against the condominium unit to which that limited common element was assigned at the time the expenses were incurred. If the limited common element involved was assigned to more than 1 condominium unit, the expenses shall be specially assessed against each of the condominium units equally so that the total of the special assessments equals the total of the expenses, except to the extent that the condominium documents provide otherwise.
(2) To the extent that the condominium documents expressly so provide, any other unusual common expenses benefiting less than all of the condominium units, or any expenses incurred as a result of the conduct of less than all those entitled to occupy the condominium project or by their licensees or invitees, shall be specially assessed against the condominium unit or condominium units involved, in accordance with reasonable provisions as the condominium documents may provide.
(3) The amount of all common expenses not specially assessed under subsections (1) and (2) shall be assessed against the condominium units in proportion to the percentages of value or other provisions as may be contained in the master deed for apportionment of expenses of administration.
(4) A co-owner shall not be exempt from contributing as provided in this act by nonuse or waiver of the use of any of the common elements or by abandonment of his or her condominium unit.

MCL 559.169 addresses the circumstances in which an assessment can be levied against an individual unit and when an assessment is required to be levied in equal proportion as to all of the co-owners. However, the Michigan Condominium Act is silent as to what happens when the annual assessment is insufficient to cover an association’s operating expenses. Accordingly, many new condominium co-owners are unaware that there are two other types of assessments that are frequently levied: additional assessments and special assessments. This article will explain the differences between additional assessments and special assessments and discuss how they relate to annual assessments as many co-owners confuse these terms.

Additional Assessments

The Michigan Condominium Act, MCL 559.101, et seq., does not specifically define “Additional Assessment” or “Special Assessment”. Accordingly, the Master Deed and/or Condominium Bylaws define the terms “Additional Assessment” and “Special Assessment”.

The board of directors of a condominium association typically sets an annual budget which projects all expenses for the coming year, and establishes a sufficient reserve fund as required by MCL 559.205. The Condominium Bylaws typically permit additional assessments in the following circumstances: (1) to meet deficits incurred or anticipated because of an insufficient annual assessment; (2) to provide replacements of existing common elements; (3) to provide additions to the common elements not exceeding certain levels; or (4) for any emergencies. In short, while the Master Deed and Bylaws will define when the board of directors can levy an additional assessment, an additional assessment is typically levied to cover unanticipated operating expenses. Most condominium documents do not provide the co-owners the right to vote on whether or not an additional assessment should be imposed. Accordingly, the decision to impose an additional assessment is most often within the sole discretion of the board of directors. Therefore, only the board of directors must vote on and approve the imposition of an additional assessment.

Special Assessments

Similar to additional assessments, there are typically specific circumstances when an association is permitted to levy a special assessment. Condominium bylaws frequently permit the imposition of a special assessment for: (1) providing additions to the Common Elements in excess of a certain amount; (2) assessments to purchase a unit upon foreclosure of the lien (although this is sometimes allowed under the additional assessment powers); or (3) assessments for any other appropriate purpose not elsewhere described. Special assessments differ from additional assessments in that they must usually be approved by a certain percentage of the co-owners before they can be levied. The number of co-owners required to approve a special assessment varies from one association to the next, but approval by at least fifty percent of the co-owners of an association is common. In short, a co-owner should review their condominium bylaws to determine the circumstances in which a special assessment may be levied and whether or not co-owner approval is required.


The main difference between additional assessments and special assessments is often that the co-owners are required to vote to approve special assessments, whereas the board of directors typically can levy an additional assessment without co-owner approval. There are also different circumstances under which an association may levy additional or special assessments. In sum, it is important for prospective purchasers of a condominium unit to review their condominium documents and understand the various types of assessments that can potentially be levied by a condominium association. This is especially true as the failure to pay an additional assessment or special assessment carries with it the same consequences of failing to pay an annual assessment. Specifically, MCL 559.206 states that a default by a co-owner shall entitle a condominium association to the following relief: “Failure to comply with any of the terms or provisions of the condominium documents, shall be grounds for relief, which may include without limitations, an action to recover sums due for damages, injunctive relief, foreclosure of lien if default in payment of assessment, or any combination thereof.” Accordingly, a co-owner that fails to pay an additional or special assessment will likely be faced with having to pay fines, late fees, interest and/or legal fees.

 Kevin Hirzel is the Managing Member of Hirzel Law, PLC and concentrates his practice on commercial litigation, community association law, condominium law, Fair Housing Act compliance, homeowners association and real estate law. Mr. Hirzel is a fellow in the College of Community Association Lawyers, a prestigious designation given to less than 175 attorneys in the country.  He has been a Michigan Super Lawyer’s Rising Star in Real Estate Law from 2013-2018, an award given to only 2.5% of the attorneys in Michigan each year. Mr. Hirzel was named an Up & Coming Lawyer by Michigan Lawyer’s Weekly in 2015, an award given to only 30 attorneys in Michigan each year. He represents community associations, condominium associations, cooperatives, homeowners associations, property owners and property managers throughout Michigan. He may be reached at (248) 480-8758 or

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share Post
Written by

Kevin Hirzel is the Managing Member of Hirzel Law, PLC. Hirzel Law has offices in Farmington, Grand Rapids, and Traverse City, Michigan with a fourth office location in Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Hirzel focuses his practice on condominium law, homeowners association law, and real estate law. He is a fellow in the College of Community Association Lawyers (“CCAL”), a prestigious designation given to less than 175 attorneys in the country. Mr. Hirzel formerly served on the CCAL National Board of Governors and is a former member of the Community Associations Institute’s (“CAI”) Board of Trustees, an international organization with over 40,000 members worldwide that is dedicated to improving community associations. Mr. Hirzel has been recognized as a Leading Lawyer in Michigan by Leading Lawyers, a distinction earned by fewer than 5% of all lawyers licensed in Michigan. He has been named a Michigan “Rising Star” in real estate law by Super Lawyers Magazine, a designation is given to no more than 2.5% of the attorneys in Michigan each year. Mr. Hirzel was also named as a “Go-To-Lawyer” in condominium and real estate law by Michigan Lawyer’s Weekly. Hirzel Law was also voted the best law firm in Metro Detroit in the Detroit Free Press Best of the Best awards. He is the Co-Chairman of the State Bar of Michigan’s Real Property Law Section Committee for Condominiums, PUDs & Cooperatives. Mr. Hirzel has authored numerous articles on community association law for publications such as the Michigan Community Association News, Michigan Real Property Review, Macomb County Bar Briefs and the Washington Post. He is also the author of the first and second editions of “Hirzel’s Handbook: How to operate a Michigan Condo or HOA”, which is available for purchase on Mr. Hirzel has been interviewed on community association legal issues by various media outlets throughout the country, such as CBS, CNBC, Common Ground Magazine, Community Association Management Insider, the Dan Abrams Show on SiriusXM Radio, the Detroit News, Dr. Drew Midday Live on KABC Radio, Fox Business News, Fox News,, the Law & Crime Network, Michigan Lawyer’s Weekly, NPR, WWJ News Radio and WXYZ. Mr. Hirzel is a dynamic speaker and frequently lectures on community association law throughout Michigan, as well as nationally at the CAI National Law Seminar, and is a two-time winner of the best manuscript award at the CAI National Law Seminar.

No comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this:


Ask us anything, or share you feedback