Can Michigan condominium development rights expire automatically when a developer fails to build units on time? In Woodfield Greens Condominium Association v Soho Land Development, Inc., unpublished per curiam opinion of the Michigan Court of Appeals, issued March 16, 2026 (Docket No. 371067), the Court affirmed that undeveloped condominium units designated as “need not be built” automatically revert to general…
Read More →
Disputes over undeveloped condominium units frequently turn on a narrow statutory question: does former MCL 559.167 apply when a developer fails to designate units as either “must be built” or “need not be built” in the master deed? Because undeveloped units can represent significant retained development value, the answer to that question carries serious financial and governance consequences for condominium…
Read More →
The Michigan Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed that a homeowners association (HOA) board has the authority to hire a property management company for compensation, even when an HOA’s bylaws state that “agents” must serve without compensation. In Neuman v. Long Lake Shores Association, the court clarified that the term “agent” does not extend to third-party vendors hired to assist in…
Read More →
On March 23, 2023, the Michigan Court of Appeals decided several important issues in favor of Michigan condominium associations. In Square Lake Hills Association v Russel Garland and Highlander Group MMC, Inc et al, unpublished opinion of the Court of Appeals, (Docket No. 360405), the Court of Appeals made the following rulings: Mere speculation is insufficient to establish that the…
Read More →
